Current:Home > reviewsKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds -DataFinance
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
View
Date:2025-04-15 18:11:31
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (12)
Related
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- Trump is appealing a narrow gag order imposed on him in his 2020 election interference case
- Britney Spears reveals she had abortion while dating Justin Timberlake in new memoir
- Love Is Blind’s Izzy Zapata Debuts New Girlfriend After Stacy Snyder Breakup
- Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
- Kansas isn't ranked in preseason women's college basketball poll. Who else got snubbed?
- 3 face federal charges in bizarre South Florida kidnapping plot
- Death Grips reportedly quits show after being hit by glowsticks: 'Bands are not robots'
- Buckingham Palace staff under investigation for 'bar brawl'
- Neymar in tears while being carted off after suffering apparent knee injury
Ranking
- DoorDash steps up driver ID checks after traffic safety complaints
- West Virginia teacher charged with abuse after student says she duct taped mouth, hands
- Illinois boy killed in alleged hate crime remembered as kind, playful as suspect appears in court
- Jurors in New Mexico convict extended family on kidnapping charges; 2 convicted on terrorism charges
- Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
- Taco Bell is the quickest fast-food drive-thru experience, study finds. Here's where the others rank.
- Miami Seaquarium’s Lolita the orca died from old age and multiple chronic illnesses, necropsy finds
- Inbox cluttered with spam? Here's how to (safely) unsubscribe from emails
Recommendation
DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
Natural History Museum vows better stewardship of human bones
Prison guard warned that Danilo Cavalcante planned escape a month before he fled, emails show
Inbox cluttered with spam? Here's how to (safely) unsubscribe from emails
Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
Vanderpump Rules' Jax Taylor Has a Special Invitation for Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce
A shirtless massage in a business meeting? AirAsia exec did it. Then posted it on LinkedIn
California family behind $600 million, nationwide catalytic converter theft ring pleads guilty